By: John Berger
This is the first time that I have read a book of a collection of essays. The essay that I enjoyed reading the most was the seventh. It discussed how images have become so important in media today for marketing and advertising; it’s very true. The main focus of this essay was publicity and how “…it proposes to each of us that we transform ourselves, or our lives, by buying something more.” (page 131) I based my semiotic paper on materialism, and although I did not include this particular reference, I truly believe in the power of advertising. Even though people realize the purpose of advertising, it ultimately has the desired effect on all of us, which is to be consumers.
The first essay was the essay that we were instructed to pay the most attention to. I believe that this essay is more closely tied to the field of media than any other essay in this collection. It would be especially of interest to the image arts students. I like the point that made during the discussion of the camera “…destroying the idea that images were timeless…” (page 18) However, I disagree with that argument. I believe that candid photography captures a unique moment, but other types of photography that create the illusion of timelessness. For example, anything to do with nature: flowers, weather. There will always be a first snowfall every year or a first rose to blossom on a vine. These are both timeless moments that could be captured in photography.
I did agree with the argument about the uniqueness of a painting and how, unlike in photography, they cannot be multiplied in the same way. However, photographs have a sense of uniqueness about them as well. A photograph can capture a moment in time that can never be repeated or documented in the same way. Both photography and painting have pros and cons to the eye of the beholder.
By manipulating pictures [for example, the “…allegorical figure [becoming] a portrait of a girl…” (page 25)] is another controversial aspect of reproducing images. Doing so does not properly merit the artist for his/her work, and should not be allowed without their permission. However, it is also important that images are available for interpretation of meaning, whether or not the meaning someone contrives is not what the artist or photographer had intended.
The third essay also interested me. It discussed the differences in how men and women are portrayed in images. This included how women and men are perceived in pictures as well. One of the more interesting points made was that “…the ‘ideal’ spectator was assumed to be male and the image of a woman is designed to flatter him…” (page 64) I found this comment kind of bizarre, because every time I look at an advertisement, for example, it seems as though the female is being more emphasized than the male. The argument being made throughout this essay was that “…men look at women. Women watch themselves be looked at.” (page 47) I thought that that was an interesting statement because it is true outside of images. Women are typically thought to be more concerned than men of the physical appearance, which includes how they look in photographs as well.Overall, I enjoyed this collection of essays thoroughly including the image curations. The curations also gave me a better idea potential themes for my image curation as well. The arguments in the essay indicated things that I think a lot of people are already aware of. Hopefully now, I will be more conscious of images and their ultimate impact on myself.